2017 SMU Event Details
Amongst all of the major ‘characters’ in the Mahabharata, Draupadi dominates the popular imagination in India where she, in my view, overshadows both Arjuna and Krishna, even though they are the protagonists of the famous conversation that forms the text of the Bhagavad Gita.
Her humiliation in the sabha of Hastinapura stands at the centre of the Mahabharata and moves events forward to their tragic denouement. It is the absolute core of the moral crisis that the Mahabharata, as a text, epitomises in a series of wrongs that are depicted: the abandonment of Karna by his mother Kunti to hide her pre-marital liaison, the lie uttered by Yudhishthira that leads to the vanquishing of guru Dronacharya, the killing of the unarmed Karna by Arjuna while he is recovering his chariot from its wheel being stuck in the mud.
Whatever be the interpretation of the dharma by which these acts are justified, all these wrongs, committed as they are by the Pandavas who won the war as the more righteous of the two sides in a battle represented as one between the forces of evil and the forces of good, lend themselves to ambiguity.
Only the humiliation of Draupadi at the hands of the Kauravas occupies the moral high ground—the utter indefensibility of the sexual violence against her in the sabha makes this one act the casus belli of the fratricidal war, a war that will virtually finish off all the kshatriyas, save a few.
Given the investment that almost everyone reading, hearing, or engaging with the text today has in the matter of ‘Draupadi in the sabhaparvan’, any discussion of the episode from a slightly different standpoint is fraught with difficulties since we are all already pre-disposed to reading Draupadi’s humiliation through the text’s own lens.
Nevertheless, I am going to give it a try since I think there is room enough to look at the episode, especially the question that Draupadi asks in the sabha which finally buys freedom for all the Pandavas from the implications of the question, rather than the question itself.
In doing so I will build on the very insightful work of a range of scholars but who, to my mind, have left some things unsaid and some critical questions unasked.
This presentation calls attention to the uncommon religious lives and worlds of Hindu holy women (sadhus) in India. As sadhus, these women practice an unconventional religious way of life known as renunciation.
Sadhus are overwhelmingly men, and the elite religious institution in which they participate has traditionally excluded women from its ranks and leadership roles. How do female sadhus create their religious authority and earn the respect, trust, and devotion of their communities and the wider society?
Drawing on sixteen years of research in Rajasthan, this presentation explores the oral life histories of female sadhus. Through their personal narratives, DeNapoli illuminates the cultural-religious categories and mythic models through which female sadhus understand their renunciation.
Using the metaphor of “singing to God,” the paper demonstrates how female sadhus perform radical devotion inspired by legendary female devotees.
Through her devotional poetry, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār constructs a devotional subjectivity that speaks the truth of Śiva’s power without reference to gender, caste, or class.
Her biographer Cēkkilār re-genders her story, locating her within patriarchal frameworks and raising questions about where and how women can speak religious truth.
Contemporary artists have drawn on her story to explore women’s empowerment, revealing Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s continuing relevance.
This paper explores the extraordinary life of Sembiyan Mahadevi, a Chola queen who exercised political, artistic, and religious authority for over sixty years.
She built temples, sponsored bronze workshops, and was granted royal authority equal to that of Emperor Rajaraja.
This paper examines nineteenth- and twentieth-century debates on matriliny in Kerala, focusing on family, affect, gender, and power.
It highlights the limitations of purely legal approaches to understanding matrilineal societies and emphasizes cultural and affective dimensions.